Программа ООН по окружающей среде

Коралловые рифы

Коралловые рифы известны как одни из самых красивых, биологически разнообразных и хрупких экосистем в мире.

Кроме того, они жизненно важны для поддержания запасов продовольствия и защиты побережья низменных островных государств.

Тем не менее, по оценкам ЮНЕП, около 25-50 процентов коралловых рифов мира были уничтожены, а еще 60 процентов находятся под угрозой.

Около 850 миллионов человек живут в пределах 100 км от коралловых рифов, известных как «тропический лес океана», и пользуются определенной экономической выгодой от экосистемных услуг.

Подразделение по вопросам коралловых рифов (CRU) было создано в 2000 году по распоряжению исполнительного директора ЮНЕП с целью координации деятельности ЮНЕП по этой проблеме. Отдел осуществляет свою деятельность совместно с конвенциями и планами действий по региональным морям и другими органами с целью: разработки инструментов и методов, которые позволяют применять экосистемные подходы к управлению коралловыми рифами; поддержки политики на региональном и национальном уровнях и демонстрационных проектов для содействия их принятию и внедрению; а также с целью наращивания потенциала и создания сетей для содействия обмену передовым опытом.

Подразделение по вопросам коралловых рифов представляет ЮНЕП в Международной инициативе по коралловым рифам и поддерживает в подготовке отчетов Глобальной сети мониторинга коралловых рифов по региональным морям.

  • Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)

    The RSCAPs play an important role in supporting the designation and effective management of MPAs by promoting the exchange of information and best practices and providing access to and mobilizing vital technical and financial resources. They also provide a mechanism through which different marine users can convene and communicate individual priorities and objectives. That enables the development of appropriate MPA designation and management practices that enable sustainable use and conservation. 

    RSCAPs and MPAs 

    1. Barcelona Convention 
    • The Contracting Parties have established a growing network of 1,233 Marine Protected Areas and other area-based conservation measures in the Mediterranean, including 39 Specially Protected Areas of Mediterranean Importance (SPAMIs). (As of 2020) 
    1. Cartagena Convention  
    • In 1997 the Caribbean Marine Protected Area Management Network and Forum (CaMPAM) was created under the auspices of the Specially Protected Area and Wildlife (SPAW) Protocol of the Cartagena Convention. This initiative brings together MPA researchers, administrators, managers, and educators from governmental entities and non-governmental organizations as well as the private sector in an inclusive network to exchange ideas and lessons learned through a variety of mechanisms. 
    1. Nairobi Convention - the Marine Protected Area outlook for the Western Indian Ocean, documents progress made by the countries in the region towards the achievement of SDG 14.5 and provides lessons and opportunities to increase momentum for achieving post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework targets. 
    1. PERSGA 
    • The signing of the Protocol Concerning the Conservation of Biological Diversity and the Establishment of Protected Areas by PERSGA member states in December 2005 was provided a regionally coordinated approach to establishment PERSGA’s MPAs Network.  
    • Has established a regional network of MPAs in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden through a regional protocol that has strengthened relationships between countries Three MPAs in the network have been designated as UNESCO World Heritage Sites 
    1. COBSEA  

    The COBSEA Strategic Directions 2023-2027 and the COBSEA Marine and Coastal Ecosystems (MCE) Framework targets the establishment of a network of MPAs in the East Asian Seas. UNEP MPAth, MPA Toolkit and Learning Platform can be used by COBSEA in assisting COBSEA participating countries in improving the management of existing MPAs and/or in preparation for upcoming MPAs. 

    1. OSPAR - The environment ministers of the North-East Atlantic countries – the Contracting Parties to the OSPAR Convention agreed on October 2021 in Cascais, Portugal on the establishment of the new marine protected area. The area covered is the size of Germany and the United Kingdom combined and will provide protection for seabirds. The high-seas marine protected area NACES (North Atlantic Current and Evlanov Seamount) covers almost 600,000 square kilometres and thus is one of the largest protected areas of the world. 
    1. Abidjan Convention 
    • The Protocol on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) with a draft of an additional protocol on MPAs and a regional guideline for MPA (marine protected areas) management including knowledge sharing on monitoring and surveillance. The decision on the governance of marine and coastal areas within the Abidjan Convention and the implementation through the development of a Regional Environmental Auditing Guidelines on coastal tourism and supporting countries to develop their national management action plan. 
    • Côte d’Ivoire in December 2020 designated its first Marine Protected Area in Grand-Bereby a coastal town of San-Pedro the with the support of Abidjan Convention. 
    • The Abidjan Convention is collaborating with the Regional Network of Marine Protected Areas in West Africa to build capacity to support protected area designation and management. 
    1. Permanent Commission of South Pacific - Activities related to marine and coastal protected areas are framed in the Protocol for the Conservation and Administration of Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of the Southeast Pacific. For the implementation of the aforementioned protocol, in 1992 the Regional Network of Coastal and Marine Protected Areas in the Southeast Pacific was established. 
    1. CPPS  has  helped  implement  the  south-east  Pacific regional network of marine and coastal protected areas. 
    1. NOWPAP launched the North-East Asia MPAs network in collaboration with the North-East Asian Subregional Programme for Environmental Cooperation, and carried out a Summary on Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in the NOWPAP  Region,  compiling  information  on  87  MPAs.   
    1. ROPME - Increased regional collaboration supported by ROPME has helped stakeholders to leverage funding, pool knowledge and expertise, share best practices and jointly address common challenges related to MPAs. 
    1. PAME - Has developed a framework for a pan-Arctic network of MPAs to support an ecologically coherent network. 
  • Integrated Coastal Zone Management / Integrated Coastal Management

    Integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) is a dynamic, multidisciplinary and iterative process to promote sustainable management of coastal zones. It covers the full cycle of information collection, planning, decision making, management and monitoring of implementation. ICZM uses the informed participation and cooperation of all stakeholders to assess the societal goals in a given coastal area, and to take actions towards meeting these objectives. It seeks, over the long-term, to balance environmental, economic, social, cultural and recreational objectives, all within the limits set by natural dynamics. 

     ICZMs/ICMs in the RSCAPs 

    1. Barcelona Convention – “Integrated Coastal Zone Management Protocol”. The Protocol on Integrated Coastal Zone Management in the Mediterranean, (ICZM Protocol) was adopted in 2008 and entered into force in 2011. The ICZM Protocol provides the legal framework for the integrated management of the Mediterranean coastal zone. The Contracting Parties adopted in 2012 the Action Plan for the implementation of the ICZM Protocol
    1. Nairobi Convention – “Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Protocol for the Western Indian Ocean”. The ICZM Protocol serves as a framework to promote regional and national integrated coastal zone management and foster cooperation for sustainable development and ocean governance in the Western Indian Ocean region. 
    1. Abidjan Convention - Pointe Noire Protocol on integrated coastal zone management . The Integrated Coastal Zone Management protocol, when it comes into force will promote integrated planning and coordinated development of the coastal zone including insular belts and river basins and will seek to maintain the integrity of insular belts, coastlines, and river basins for the benefit of present and future generations. 
    1. HELCOM - Integrated Coastal Zone Management has been implemented in the Baltic Sea during the last 20 years. The Baltic Sea Joint Comprehensive Environmental Action Programme (JCP) by HELCOM (1992-2012) included development of Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plans for five coastal lagoons and wetlands, four of which were transboundary; HELCOM Recommendation 24/10 “Implementation of Integrated Marine and Coastal Management of Human Activities in the Baltic Sea Area“ , adopted by Contracting Parties to the Helsinki Convention in 2003 (currently under revision); Eight Baltic Sea countries implement EU Recommendation on Integrated Coastal Zone Management from 2002. 
  • Marine Spatial Planning (MSP)

    Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is a public process of analyzing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities in marine areas to achieve ecological, economic and social objectives that have been specified through a political process.  

    MSP in the RSCAPs 

    1. Nairobi Convention - A Strategic Framework for Marine Spatial Planning in the Western Indian Ocean. The main purpose of regional strategic framework is to support the region to address transboundary and cross-sectoral marine management challenges, with a focus on MSP as an approach to promote a healthy social-ecological system for the coasts and seas of the WIO. 
    1. NOWPAP“Regional guidelines for integrated coastal planning and management”. The objective guidelines is to assist member states in applying efficient Integrated Coastal Area and River Basin Management (ICARM) methodologies and best practices including coastal area and river basin planning (landscape, urban and marine spatial).  
    1. COBSEA - COBSEA’s Strategic Directions and the COBSEA MCE Framework have identified Marine and Coastal Spatial Planning (MCSP) as a way to balance the use of marine space and resources in the region by integrating economic and social activities in ecosystem conservation. COBSEA has been providing regional training and capacity building efforts on MCSP, shall continue these efforts and further conduct exchange of knowledge amongst the participating countries and improve regional capacity on the development and implementation of MCSP to achieve Kunming-Montreal GBF Target 1. 
    1. HELCOM - The Vision  and  Strategies  around  the  Baltic  Sea  (VASAB) & HELCOM,  have  been mandated  by  the coastal  countries  to  jointly  coordinate  of  Marine  Spatial  Planning  at  the  whole  sea  basin scale.  These  two  regional  and  intergovernmental  organisations  established  the  HELCOM-VASAB Marine Spatial Planning working group in 2010 for this purpose. 
    1. Abidjan Convention decision on establishing Marine Spatial Planning by drafting of a regional guideline on MSP, collaboration with IOC-UNESCO on the MSPGlobal2 Project, the transboundary MSP between Benin and Togo, and assisting technically Togo to define the pathways of the MSP process through WACA ResIP. 
    1. The China State  Oceanic  Administration  (SOA)  undertook  a  collaborative  programme  with Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) in 1994, to implement an Integrated Coastal Zone Management programme. The programme consisted of four phases (Phase I 1994-1999, Phase II 2000-2006, Phase III 2009-2013, Phase IV 2014-2018) in 20 coastal cities, after which Integrated Coastal Zone Management was implemented in Xiamen  city, Fujian Province.
  • Large Marine Ecosystem (LMEs)

    Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) are relatively large areas of ocean space of about 200,000 km2 or more, adjacent to the continents in coastal waters and extending out seaward to the break or slope of the continental shelf or out to the seaward extent of a well-defined current system along coasts lacking continental shelves. LMEs are characterized by their unique undersea topography, current and water mass structure, marine productivity, and food chain interactions. 

    Globally, the world’s oceans have been divided into 66 large marine ecosystems (LMEs).

    LMEs provide direct services approaching US$3 trillion annually, with a non-market value estimated at $US22 trillion each year.  

     The GEF support has been key in supporting multiple countries to collaborate on strategic, long-term ocean governance of transboundary resources for sustainable development of LMEs. The International Waters focal area has invested US$285 million, leveraging US$1.14 billion in financing from other partners. With GEF support, at least 124 countries are now working together on shared large marine ecosystems. 

  • Locally Managed Marine Area (LMMA)

    A Locally Managed Marine Area (LMMA) is an area of nearshore waters and its associated coastal and marine resources that is largely or wholly managed at a local level by the coastal communities, land-owning groups, partner organizations, and/or collaborative government representatives who reside or are based in the immediate area. Establishment of an LMMA enables communities to make decisions on which fishing methods and other activities can or cannot be carried out in their waters. Typically, a community also designates a portion of their marine area as a no-take zone where no fishing is allowed, providing additional protection and an increase of marine life in many cases,

  • Fisheries closure

    Periodic closures involve temporarily banning the harvesting of marine resources in specific areas. Establishing temporary fishery closures in an area can temporarily remove the most direct pressure from fishing to subtidal benthic invertebrates, and provide relief to impacted populations, which are, in theory, able to recover over time during the temporary closure. Temporary closures can include: 1) seasonal closures, often done with the aim of protecting adults during the spawning season or to protect juveniles during times of recruitment or settlement, 2) rotational closures during which areas are alternately closed and opened to fishing following a specific timing, or 3) move-on rules whereby temporary closure of a fished area occurs when a catch or by-catch threshold is reached.  

  • Marine Conservation Agreements (MCAs)

    MCAs are defined as any formal or informal contractual arrangement that aims to achieve coastal conservation goals in which one or more parties (usually right-holders) voluntarily commit to taking certain actions, refraining from certain actions, or transferring certain rights and responsibilities in exchange for one or more other parties (usually conservation-oriented entities) voluntarily committing to deliver explicit (direct or indirect) economic incentives. 

     MCAs can be entered into by governments, communities, private entities, and private individuals. They are based on agreed upon terms and conditions, are often bottom-up approaches, and include quid-pro-quo incentives wherein all parties receive benefits. 

  • Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem (VMEs)

    VMEs are groups of species, communities or habitats that are highly susceptible to damage from bottom trawling, deep-sea mining, oil and gas exploration, and other extractive activities due to their sensitivity and slow recovery rate.  VMEs include features such as seamounts, hydrothermal vents and cold-water coral and sponge habitats

    VMEs in the RSCAPs 

    CCAMLR 

    • In 2007 Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) implemented a comprehensive measure to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs), recognising the 2006 UN General Assembly Resolution 61/105 on this issue. VMEs include features such as seamounts, hydrothermal vents and cold-water coral and sponge habitats. The measure applies to all high-seas areas of the Convention Area and requires an assessment of the impact of activities on VMEs, and the development of measures to reduce these impacts. 
    • In 2007, CCAMLR implemented a comprehensive measure to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) recognising the 2006 UN General Assembly Resolution 61/105 on this issue. The measure applies to all high-seas areas of the Convention Area and requires an assessment of the impact of activities on VMEs, and the development of measures to reduce these impacts 

     

  • Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)

    The  Black  Sea  Commission  and  the Tehran Convention Secretariats have worked together with their Parties on the description of EBSAs in the Black Sea and Caspian Sea